&
Advertise Here with Today.com
 

Archive for the 'Legislation' Category

Jan 07 2009

Burris, Blagojevich and the mess that is Illinois government

Illinois government has been a laughingstock since before Christmas. That’s when our sleazy governor with the bouffant hair do was arrested for, among other things, trying to sell the open Senate seat vacated by incoming president Barack Obama.

Everyone wants the governor to resign. But that isn’t going to happen. Blagojevich, who’s been an embarrassment ever since taking office two — yes, Illinois voters voted him back in! — terms ago, is maintaining his innocence, despite overwhelming evidence that indicates he was using his governorship to make him and his wife rich.

Showing his defiance, Blagojevich recently appointed longtime political hack Roland Burris to Obama’s former seat. This was a shrewd move on Blagojevich’s part: Burris is black. He immediately picked up support because of this. Critics are also a bit muted partly because Chicago has such a long history of racial unrest. There’s still, unfortunately, a big divide between blacks and whites in the city. Chicago remains perhaps the most segregated city in the country.

So the news today is that Burris will probably get his Senate seat. This is disgusting. Burris should first of all be ashamed of himself for even accepting a nomination from such a tainted official as Blagojevich. Burris knows exactly why Blagojevich appointed him. The governor is using Burris to stick it to everyone who wants to see him locked up as soon as possible.

The news is disappointing, too, because it shows that despite Obama’s election, the city of Chicago and the state of Illinois is nowhere near solving its racial problems. I guess it was naive to think otherwise.

Advertise Here with Today.com

No responses yet

Dec 16 2008

If we managed our finances like the states manage theirs …

Can you imagine if we all handled our household finances the way state governments handle their budgets? There wouldn’t be a person alive who wasn’t in danger of losing their homes to foreclosure.

I live in Illinois. We’re lucky enough to have been guided for the last several years by Gov. Rod Blagojevich. You might be familiar with the name. He’s just been arrested for several things, including trying to sell to the highest bidder the vacated Senate Seat left behind by president-elect Barack Obama.

That’s embarrassing enough. Now we get the news, as reported in this story in Crain’s Chicago Business, that Illinois is nearing financial disaster. Hooray.

I’ve never quite understood why state governments have been unable to run their kingdoms without running out of money all the time. My wife comes from Michigan, which is in even worse financial shape than is Illinois. Haven’t any of these people ever balanced a budget? Haven’t they ever had to figure out if they had enough money to go to the movies and dinner on a Saturday night? And if they decided that they didn’t, did they still go and put it all on their credit cards?

I know running a state government is incredibly complicated. But still … when the economy was thriving, when the housing market was booming, didn’t any of these idiot government officials think to save a bit for the inevitable slowdown?

One response so far

Dec 15 2008

Scam artists make it harder for real foreclosure victims

Much of my writing income comes from the stories I write on residential real estate. When I started covering the home-selling business, the country was in the middle of a huge housing boom. It seemed that everyone was selling their homes and making tons of money while doing it.

That, of course, has all changed. Today, no one wants to put their homes on the market. Sale prices have dipped dramatically in most major markets across the United States. And, even worse, loads of people are now struggling to make their mortgage payments, and are now facing foreclosure.

I’ve run into a lot of people who have no sympathy for people in danger of losing their homes. They peg foreclosure victims as homeowners who were simply greedy, and who purchased too much home for their income. It’s true that some foreclosure victims do fall into this category. But the vast, vast majority of them are simply people who’ve run into tough luck: They may have lost their jobs. They may have suffered a serious injury or illness. They may have been talked into an unsound adjustable-rate mortgage loan by a lender who was supposed to be looking out for their best interests.

Unfortunately, stories like this one, which ran in a recent USA Today, and which I blogged about on one of my other sites, don’t help this situation any. The story talks about homeowners who are intentionally missing their mortgage payments so that they may qualify for federal housing assistance.

It is people like this, scam artists, who create the atmosphere of cynicism that causes people to regard all foreclosure victims as either greedy, lazy or dishonest.

Losing a home is a terrible tragedy. Even missing some mortgage payments is enough to cause homeowners serious stress, shame and angst. So remember, next time you grouse about the fact that “someone is getting something for nothing,” that most foreclosure victims are hard-working folks who’ve just gotten caught up in some bad luck.

One response so far

Nov 15 2008

Tough economy means more work-at-home moms

I found an interesting work-at-home story yesterday on the Web site of WKYC in Cleveland. Seems the tough economy is forcing more stay-at-home moms to search for jobs that they can work from their homes. It’s all an effort to bring in even a little extra income.

You can read the story here. The first comment after the story, by the way, is quite clever. Someone wrote: “My life has been so much easier now that I opened that brothel at my house.”

But seriously folks, in today’s staggering economy, it’s true that every little bit of extra income can help, especially with the dreaded holidays approaching. So if a stay-at-home mom or dad can find a part-time job that still allows time to play and watch the kids, why not? We need more people working from home, not less.

The big challenge, of course, is to weed out the scammers or flakes before accepting a work-from-home job. With the popularity and ease of craigslist, it’s easier than ever for scammers to sucker people desperate for a little extra cash. Unfortunately, there’s no sure-fire way to determine who is a scammer and who isn’t. There are hints: Ads filled with typos are usually a good warning. If someone advertising a work-from-home job doesn’t actually say what the work is, that’s another one to avoid. Those that sound too good to be true — Make $7,000 a week working from home! — are usually scams. And those that you see popping up on craigslist over and over again usually are up to no good.

The main weapon anyone has in identifying a work-from-home scam is common sense. If something doesn’t seem right, trust your instincts and stay away. Otherwise, go for the work-from-home job. Today, we can all use the extra dollars.

No responses yet

Nov 11 2008

Working for yourself as stable as working in an office?

People always ask me if I’m ever nervous that so much of my income comes from working as a home-based freelance writer. Wouldn’t I be more comfortable with a steady salary, one that I could count on from month to month?

Well, I would be more comfortable with a steady income that I could count on from month to month. Thing is, I don’t know too many office jobs that come with any guarantees these days. Companies go out of business every day. Companies lay off or fire employees every day, often even though the employees have done nothing wrong. The office world doesn’t offer much stability any more. That’s just a fact of the working world today.

Look at these numbers recently released by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. The national unemployment rate in October hit 6.5 percent, a 14-year high. Employers shed 240,000 jobs in the month. When you factor in discouraged workers, those who’ve given up trying to find new jobs, the rate jumps to 11.8 percent. Those are scary numbers.

So where’s the stability out there? At least when you work as a freelancer, you can count on yourself. I certainly wouldn’t count on an employer.

No responses yet

Nov 10 2008

Taking down the campaign signs

I couldn’t hold out any longer. This weekend, I had to take down my Obama campaign signs. Sure, I wanted to revel in Obama’s big win as long as possible. But we live in a part of the state that’s still largely Republican. I didn’t want to rub it in anyone’s face. (I did notice that the McCain/Palin signs in the neighborhood disappeared awfully quickly following the election.)

Working from home, I think my neighbors expect my house to be in better shape than it is. It certainly isn’t an eyesore, but we don’t have the top lawn on the block. I’d say, instead, that it would rank in the bottom third. Sometimes I can hear what my neighbors are thinking: He’s home all day and he still hasn’t cut the lawn? Or, why hasn’t he taken down those campaign signs yet?

Well, there’s a reason for this. Actually, there are two. The first is that I hate working on the house. Give me a drill and a hammer and I’d rather use them on my head than our home’s deck.

There’s a second reason, though. And it’s that I actually am as busy as anyone else who has a career.

This is what people don’t get. Just because I work from home doesn’t mean that I have limitless free time. I’m usually working. It’s the curse of the work-from-homer, though: Everyone thinks you’re watching TV and snoozing on the couch.

I hope that as more people join the work-from-home ranks that this changes. I think it will. It’ll just take time. In the meantime, tackle those housework chores as best as you can. But don’t sweat it if the grass is a bit too high. You have real work to do.

No responses yet

Nov 07 2008

Fox News, CNN, MSNBC embarrass themselves

Journalists aren’t always at their best on election night. Remember the disaster that was election coverage in 2000, when the media kept announcing winners and then recanting?

And this year? Why on earth did CNN think we needed holograms. And why did CNN think we needed a hologram of the guy from the Black Eyed Peas? Did the powers that be think the guy who helped come up with My Humps had some amazing political insight to share with the world?

Working from home gives my wife and I time to catch a bit more of the cable news shows than is probably healthy. And when your 1-year-old son is up at 5 a.m., you can’t help but flip on the TV for a bit. I’m sorry to say, there are several “journalists” out there who are an embarrassment to the profession.

Let’s start with MSNBC’s Chris Matthews, who recently said that part of his job was to help make sure that Barack Obama has a successful presidency. Now, I voted for Obama. I even have my Obama sign still stuck proudly in my front lawn. But it’s no journalist’s job to make sure Obama has a successful presidency. A journalist’s job is to ask the tough questions, no matter who is in office.

Then there’s Fox News, of course, the biggest pile of junk on TV. This morning (And, yes, I watch even though I hate the channel. I don’t know why, either.) Fox & Friends’ anchor Steve Doocy was moderating a panel of four distinguished pundits, a panel that included an incredibly lame comedian whose name I’ve already forgotten and Chicago’s own Jerry Springer. That Springer was the voice of reason is a bit frightening. Anyway, during the discussion, Doocy compared Barack Obama accidentally referring to the 57 states of the United States to Sarah Palin thinking that Africa was a country. Doocy said the two were basically the same, and that Palin has received far more criticism.

This is, of course, ridiculous, even for Fox News. Obama misspoke. He certainly knows that we have 50 states. (Although, we could probably stand to lose a few of them.) Palin, on the other hand, actually thought that Africa was a country. News flash: It’s a continent. That’s not a slip of the tongue. That’s a slip of the brain, far worse.

Sometimes when I watch the TV news shows, or even our own local news, which, here in Chicago, is dumber than dumb, I’m ashamed to say that I, too, am a reporter.

No responses yet

Nov 05 2008

Election night and the bloggers were busy

It was an exciting night last night, wasn’t it? Even if you weren’t pulling for Obama, you had to appreciate the historic nature of his win last night. It’s high time the United States had a president who wasn’t white, don’t you think? I hope Obama’s win has opened up the door for other minority candidates and, of course, for female candidates, too. (Hillary Clinton, I think, has already proved that a female candidate can be a legitimate threat to win the presidency.)

The night had extra meaning for me. I’m white. But our youngest son — he just turned 1 in September — is not. We adopted him from Ethiopia. To me, the unending lineup of white males for president was an embarrassment to our country. Why was there never any female presidents, Asian presidents, African-American presidents, Hispanic presidents? But last night gave me hope. I hope that our youngest son will grow up and not think it’s unusual at all for a non-white person to hold the highest office in our land.

Now, it may turn out that Barack Obama is nothing more than a political hack. Hailing from Chicago, I’ve watched Obama move up the political ladder. And, yes, he’s made some questionable decisions during his ascension. The worst sin might have been when he endorsed the current board president of Cook County, as crooked and slimy a politician as you could imagine. But that politician was a Barack supporter — quid pro quo, I suppose. But even if Obama turns out to be a mediocre president — and I can’t believe he’d be any worse than the doofus currently in the White House — his victory will still be an amazing achievement for this country. Now it’s really true that anyone can be president (as long as he or she aligns with one of the two major parties and can somehow raise millions of dollars to campaign). That’s what last night was all about.

Of course, the bloggers were busy last night. And today. Most bloggers, even the ones I disagree with, make good points. But some …

Let’s clear this up, for all the idiot bloggers out there: Barack Obama may be many things, but he is not a Muslim. And even if he was a Muslim, so what? It’s not illegal to be Muslim in this country. And there are plenty of Muslims who love this country. Secondly, Barack Obama is not a socialist. In fact, if you’re looking for a socialist, look to George Bush and the members of his administration. Aren’t they the ones who passed a $700 billion package to bailout failing banks? Isn’t that socialism? It seems that certain people in this country are totally against socialistic policies when they’re designed to help poor people, but in favor of them when they’re used to bail out corporations.

No responses yet

Oct 18 2008

Working from home no longer so odd

When I first started working from home full-time about eight years ago, people tended to snicker: They pictured me lounging around the house eating potato chips all day. (I do eat too many potato chips, but that’s a different story.)

That might have been because the number of people who did work from home was still relatively small. Today, though, that’s changed.

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, 15.1 percent of workers worked from their homes in 2004. That’s up from 2.3 percent who did the same in 1980. Not a bad increase for just a little more than two decades.

Let’s not forget, too, that more people are working some days from home and others at the office. I have a friend who works three days a week a home and two at the office. His employer is more than OK with this; His company encourages it. In fact, workers at his company don’t even have regular desks. They sign in when they’re in the office and are then assigned a desk and computer. (They don’t have to sign up for the office gossip, however.)

Today, then, when I tell people I work from home, I don’t get as many snickers. I do notice some jealousy, however. And why not? Who wouldn’t want to skip the long commute to and from the office, the time wasted in endless meetings and all that office gossip? I sure don’t miss it.

So remember, if you do work from home, or if you want to work from home, remember that you’re far from alone. There are millions of us work-from-homers out there. And we’re getting bigger all the time! (Must be all those potato chips.)

No responses yet

Oct 09 2008

Waiting for the checks

Michael, who runs his own Today.com blog, http://fearlesshistory.today.com, reminded me when he commented on one of my earlier posts of one of the biggest challenges of working from home. And it’s a challenge that’s doubled when both you and your spouse work from home at the same time: Waiting for those freelance checks.

It’s one thing if you’re a salaried employee who happens to work from home. But if the majority of your income comes from freelance work, as does both mine and my wife’s, then you always seem to be waiting for someone to pay you. It seems that companies suffer no guilt from paying late when you’re working for them as a mere freelance contractor.

What can you do about it? Not much. When I notice a late payer, I usually start with a friendly e-mail message, something like, “Hi, there. I haven’t yet received my payment of XXX for the work I did on XXXX.” I also offer to re-send my invoice if they need it. If that doesn’t work, it’s time for phone calls. And if that doesn’t work?

That’s where it gets tricky. You can always threaten legal action. But are you prepared to follow through? I hate to say it, but sometimes the cost and hassle of court action — most times, in fact — just isn’t worth it to recover a missing payment. Sad but true.

I’ve been fairly fortunate. Sure, some publishers have stiffed me. But not that many, and I’ve been doing this freelance-writing thing for about 15 years now. When I was a relatively naive young freelance writer, I did do $2,000 worth of work for a start-up Internet publisher, an outfit calling itself Boomers.com. The company saw itself as creating a community for Baby Boomers, and I was hired to write sports columns for them. I never saw any of that money. But I did learn my lesson. One: Avoid writing start-ups, unless the amount of work is easy and relatively small. Start-ups are notorious for going under. Two: Don’t do additional work until you’ve received that first payment. Three: Make sure the company you’re working for actually has a model in place to generate income for itself. Boomers.com, apparently, didn’t.

The key to success when working from home is to make sure there’s always enough work coming in, and that you always have enough assignments, to make up for the occasional deadbeat payer.

No responses yet

Advertise Here